Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-4000
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-4000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR400 was manufactured 3 years later than the FE-4000 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR400 scores versus the FE-4000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Olympus FE-4000. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus FE-4000
EX-ZR400 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | July 2009 | More recent by 43 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Casio EX-ZR400
FE-4000 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus FE-4000
EX-ZR400 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 features outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus FE-4000 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-4000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the FE-4000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and FE-4000 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and FE-4000.
Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR400 to result in extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus FE-4000 |
Also called as | - | X-925 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 136 gr (0.30 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $130 |