Clicky

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-M10 IV

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
Portability
81
Imaging
63
Features
83
Overall
71

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released January 2013
Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Launched August 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview

In this article, we are evaluating the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus E-M10 IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (20MP) is very close but the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-ZR400 was introduced 8 years prior to the E-M10 IV and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-ZR400 matches up vs the E-M10 IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 EX-ZR400 E-M10 IV 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Casio EX-ZR400

 E-M10 IV EX-ZR400 
LaunchedAugust 2020January 2013Fresher by 91 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k461kCrisper display (+579k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus E-M10 IV

 EX-ZR400 E-M10 IV 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 IV has dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus E-M10 IV in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the E-M10 IV.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-M10 IV size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and E-M10 IV is 92 and 81 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-M10 IV top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through technical specs. The graphic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and E-M10 IV.

As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR400 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M10 IV will provide you with more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older EX-ZR400 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-M10 IV sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography factors
Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography factors
40
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
77
has manual focus
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
exports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Street photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
84
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
has touch to focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography information
Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography information
57
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high max fps (30.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
good battery life (500 shots)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
73
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography factors
71
good battery life (500 shots)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
85
connects via bluetooth
has touch to focus
resolution is good (20MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-M10 IV as a Landscape photography camera
52
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good battery life (500 shots)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
83
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging highlights
33
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (205g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
78
selfie friendly screen
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
missing external mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus E-M10 IV
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR400Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV
General Information
Company Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2013-01-29 2020-08-04
Physical type Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS TruePic VIII
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW photos
Lowest boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 121
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 107
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 461k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.62x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Highest quiet shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shooting rate 30.0 frames per second 8.7 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m 7.20 m (at ISO 200)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205g (0.45 lb) 383g (0.84 lb)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos 360 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-130 BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported)
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $0 $699