Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C140
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C140 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Kodak C140, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and C140 (8MP) and the EX-ZR700 (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR700 was revealed 4 years after the C140 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a full comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-ZR700 grades against the C140 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C140 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Kodak EasyShare C140. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Kodak C140
| EX-ZR700 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 50 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| C140 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Kodak C140
| EX-ZR700 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 has physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Kodak C140 has proportions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Kodak C140 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the C140.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and C140 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specs. The image here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and C140.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR700 using its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Casio EX-ZR700 will give greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR700 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 13cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $370 | $80 |
