Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus E-520
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-510
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus E-520 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus E-520, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the EX-ZR700 (1/2.3") and E-520 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR700 was unveiled 4 years after the E-520 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR700 grades versus the E-520 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus E-520. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus E-520
| EX-ZR700 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | August 2008 | Newer by 55 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| E-520 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus E-520
| EX-ZR700 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 comes with exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus E-520 has proportions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus E-520 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the E-520.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and E-520 is 91 and 68 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and E-520.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR700 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Casio EX-ZR700 will deliver more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR700 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus E-520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus E-520 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2008-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 3 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 45 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 548 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | 650 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $370 | $400 |
