Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR700 was launched 12 months later than the TG-820 iHS so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR700 scores vs the TG-820 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
EX-ZR700 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | February 2012 | Fresher by 12 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR700
TG-820 iHS | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 922k | Sharper screen (+108k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
EX-ZR700 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and TG-820 iHS is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The graphic here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and TG-820 iHS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR700 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 220 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $370 | $500 |