Clicky

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
53
Overall
45
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Announced March 2010
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the EX-ZR700 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") come with different sensor sizing.

Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

The EX-ZR700 was introduced 2 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZR700 scores versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 EX-ZR700 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013March 2010More modern by 35 months
Screen resolution922k920kCrisper screen (+2k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-ZR700

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC EX-ZR700 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 EX-ZR700 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has got exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 91 and 85 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The image underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

To sum up, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR700 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR700 will produce more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography advice
44
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
provides face detection focusing
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
36
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (222g)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others in class (355 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/1.7")
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography info
51
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview feature
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
71
better than average battery (470 shots)
lighter than average (222 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
60
lighter than others in class (355g)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography factors
52
manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
better than average battery (470 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
47
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
34
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (222g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
missing external mic socket
28
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (355 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone support
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR700Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2013-01-29 2010-03-18
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor EXILIM Engine HS 3 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-450mm (18.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 922 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 180s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 4.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 222 grams (0.49 pounds) 355 grams (0.78 pounds)
Dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 pictures 410 pictures
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $370 $349