Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR800 was manufactured 4 years after the SP-565UZ which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the SP-565UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
EX-ZR800 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 56 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Casio EX-ZR800
SP-565UZ | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus SP-565UZ
EX-ZR800 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus SP-565UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the SP-565UZ.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and SP-565UZ is 91 and 72 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and SP-565UZ.
Clearly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to provide more detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 413g (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $429 | $400 |