Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 6010
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 6010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6010
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 6010 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus 6010, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and 6010 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks SuggestThe EX-ZR800 was released 4 years later than the 6010 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the 6010 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 6010 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6010. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus 6010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus 6010
EX-ZR800 | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 50 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Casio EX-ZR800
6010 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus 6010
EX-ZR800 | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 6010 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 has physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus 6010 has proportions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus 6010 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the 6010.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and 6010 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 6010 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The photograph below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and 6010.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 6010 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus 6010 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 |
Other name | - | mju Tough 6010 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2009-07-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50C |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $429 | $0 |