Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched August 2013
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Released February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-ZR800 was revealed 19 months later than the TG-820 iHS which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the TG-820 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

		

		

			
 EX-ZR800 TG-820 iHS 
ReleasedAugust 2013February 2012Fresher by 19 months
Manual focus  Dial accurate focus
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR800

		

		

			
 TG-820 iHS EX-ZR800 
Screen resolution1030k922kClearer screen (+108k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-820 iHS

		

		

			
 EX-ZR800 TG-820 iHS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen  Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen  Lacking Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 features exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the TG-820 iHS.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and TG-820 iHS is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
	
			Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Portrait photography camera
 Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
44
 focusing manually
 good megapixels (16MP)
 comes with face detection focusing
 can't use external flash
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
27
 offers face detection focus
 lack of manual focus
 manual mode not possible
 cannot use external flash
 megapixel count low (12MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
Photography Glossary
Street Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Street photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
61
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors in class (222 grams)
 screen is fixed
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
61
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 fixed screen
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography advice
51
 excellent zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good megapixels (16MP)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 better than average battery power (470 per charge)
 max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect AF
34
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers tracking autofocus
 environment proof
 low frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
 no shutter priority
 megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 terrible battery life (220 CIPA)
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography highlights
74
 better than average battery power (470 shots)
 lighter than competitors in class (222g)
 good megapixels (16MP)
 has built in flash
 relatively wide (25mm)
 long zoom (450mm)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
59
 environment proof
 flash built-in
 rather wide (28mm)
 lack of Timelapse recording
 terrible battery life (220 CIPA)
 megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
55
 focusing manually
 relatively wide (25mm)
 screen is a good size (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good megapixels (16 megapixels)
 better than average battery power (470 shots)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
38
 rather wide (28mm)
 screen size is good (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 lack of manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
 manual mode not possible
 megapixel count low (12MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
 terrible battery life (220 CIPA)
 lack of Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging factors
34
 relatively wide (25mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detection focusing
 video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competitors in class (222g)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly display
 lack of external microphone socket
33
 rather wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers face detection focus
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 lack of external microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	

		

			
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Olympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Olympus TG-820 iHS
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Launched 2013-08-07 2012-02-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
AF continuous    
AF single    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-450mm (18.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range 4cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 922 thousand dots 1,030 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 222 grams (0.49 lbs) 206 grams (0.45 lbs)
Dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 pictures 220 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-130 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $429 $500