Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR800 was launched 3 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| EX-ZR800 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 |  | March 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-ZR800
| GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| EX-ZR800 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 91 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The image here will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR800 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Casio EX-ZR800 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2013-08-07 | 2010-03-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.5-4.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 355g (0.78 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 410 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $429 | $349 |