Clicky

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim TRYX front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z950 front
Portability
89
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs

Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
  • Released June 2010
Photography Glossary

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Casio TRYX and Kodak Z950, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The TRYX was unveiled 7 months later than the Z950 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Kodak Z950 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TRYX grades versus the Z950 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Kodak Z950

 TRYX Z950 
ReleasedJanuary 2011June 2010More recent by 7 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Casio TRYX

 Z950 TRYX 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus

Common features in the Casio TRYX and Kodak Z950

 TRYX Z950 
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio TRYX has external measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z950 has proportions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).

See the Casio TRYX and Kodak Z950 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the TRYX and the Z950.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and Z950 is 99 and 89 respectively.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 top view buttons comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out specs. The visual here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and Z950.

All in all, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution and you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you need to factor the age of the cameras into account. The younger TRYX should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 sensor size comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio TRYX Portrait photography details
Kodak Z950 Portrait photography details
21
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
29
manual focus
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio TRYX Street photography highlights
Kodak Z950 Street photography highlights
58
screen can move to multiple angles
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
52
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competition (243 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio TRYX Sports photography details
Kodak Z950 Sports photography details
17
focal length is fixed (21mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250 seconds)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Casio TRYX Travel photography info
Kodak Z950 Travel photography info
56
display is selfie friendly
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
52
built-in flash
very long reach (350mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (243 grams)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio TRYX Landscape photography factors
Kodak Z950 Landscape photography factors
28
screen size is good (3 inch)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (21mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
37
manual focus
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio TRYX Vlogging factors
Kodak Z950 Vlogging factors
62
display is selfie friendly
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
doesn't have mic port
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic port
heavier than competition (243 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio TRYX and Kodak Z950
 Casio Exilim TRYXKodak EasyShare Z950
General Information
Brand Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim TRYX Kodak EasyShare Z950
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2011-01-05 2010-06-16
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Highest enhanced ISO - 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 21mm (1x) 35-350mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8 f/3.5-4.8
Macro focusing range 8cm 6cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/8s 1/8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1250s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 5.40 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 243 grams (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $689 $250