Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Released June 2010
Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio TRYX and Kodak Z950, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TRYX was unveiled 7 months later than the Z950 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Kodak Z950 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TRYX grades versus the Z950 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim TRYX & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The full galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Kodak Z950
TRYX | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | June 2010 | More recent by 7 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Casio TRYX
Z950 | TRYX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Kodak Z950
TRYX | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio TRYX has external measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z950 has proportions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio TRYX and Kodak Z950 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the TRYX and the Z950.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and Z950 is 99 and 89 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out specs. The visual here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and Z950.
All in all, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution and you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you need to factor the age of the cameras into account. The younger TRYX should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio TRYX vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
Casio Exilim TRYX | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Kodak |
Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 8cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/8s | 1/8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1250s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 243 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $689 | $250 |