Casio TRYX vs Sigma SD9
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Casio TRYX vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced November 2002
- Newer Model is Sigma SD10
Casio TRYX vs Sigma SD9 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Casio TRYX versus Sigma SD9, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the TRYX (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TRYX was announced 8 years after the SD9 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the TRYX matches up against the SD9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio TRYX vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX and Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Sigma SD9
TRYX | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | November 2002 | Newer by 99 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 130k | Sharper display (+331k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio TRYX
SD9 | TRYX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Sigma SD9
TRYX | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio TRYX vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio TRYX provides exterior measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
See the Casio TRYX versus Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the TRYX compared to the SD9.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and SD9 is 99 and 54 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking specs. The pic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and SD9.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TRYX with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Casio TRYX will resolve more detail with its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The newer TRYX is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio TRYX vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio TRYX vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Casio Exilim TRYX | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Sigma SD9 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 8cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/8s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 950g (2.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $689 | $3,001 |