FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-340
Portability
94 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
94 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
FujiFilm AV250
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix AV255
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the FujiFilm AV250 and Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the AV250 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe AV250 was launched 12 months earlier than the VR-340 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the AV250 matches up against the VR-340 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV250 & Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm AV250 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV250 over the Olympus VR-340
| AV250 | VR-340 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the FujiFilm AV250
| VR-340 | AV250 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 12 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV250 and Olympus VR-340
| AV250 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The FujiFilm AV250 comes with outer measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm AV250 and Olympus VR-340 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the AV250 vs the VR-340.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the AV250 and VR-340 is 94 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the AV250 and VR-340.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same MP so you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you might want to take the age of the cameras into account. The older AV250 will be behind in sensor technology.
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm AV250 Portrait photography information
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography information
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
features face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
FujiFilm AV250 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Street photography camera
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sports photography with FujiFilm AV250
Sports photography with Olympus VR-340
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
includes tracking focus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
max frames per second very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
features tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with FujiFilm AV250
Travel photography with Olympus VR-340
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
good max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (180 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (32mm)
lighter than average (125g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm AV250 Landscape photography information
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography information
good max aperture (f)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (32mm)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm AV250 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging information
good max aperture (f)
wide angle not good (32mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone jack
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
lighter than average (125g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone support
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm AV250 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Also called as | FinePix AV255 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $130 |
