FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus FE-5020
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
91 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
FujiFilm F300EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix F305EXR
Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus FE-5020, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the FE-5020 (12MP) is very well matched but the F300EXR (1/2") and FE-5020 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe F300EXR was announced 13 months after the FE-5020 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the F300EXR grades versus the FE-5020 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR & Olympus FE-5020. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Olympus FE-5020
| F300EXR | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the FujiFilm F300EXR
| FE-5020 | F300EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus FE-5020
| F300EXR | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm F300EXR offers external dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5020 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm F300EXR and Olympus FE-5020 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the F300EXR vs the FE-5020.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the F300EXR and FE-5020 is 91 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The image below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the F300EXR and FE-5020.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The F300EXR uses the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF easier. The more modern F300EXR provides an edge in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR Portrait photography info
Olympus FE-5020 Portrait photography info
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2")
doesn't have RAW files
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm F300EXR
Street photography with Olympus FE-5020
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (215 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2")
doesn't have RAW files
environment proofing
lighter than average (137g)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR Sports photography features
Olympus FE-5020 Sports photography features
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max frames per second low (2.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
environment proofing
low maximum shutter speed (1/500s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR Travel photography factors
Olympus FE-5020 Travel photography factors
lighter than others (215 grams)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (360mm)
missing Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than average (137g)
environment proofing
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus FE-5020 as a Landscape photography camera
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
pretty wide (24mm)
environment proofing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm F300EXR Vlogging advice
Olympus FE-5020 Vlogging advice
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (215g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic support
pretty wide (24mm)
lighter than average (137 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Also called | FinePix F305EXR | X-935 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) | 137 grams (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $280 | $160 |
