FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus TG-320
93 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 205g - 99 x 59 x 23mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is FinePix F75EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets look more closely at the FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the F70EXR (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the F70EXR (1/2") and TG-320 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe F70EXR was brought out 3 years earlier than the TG-320 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the F70EXR grades against the TG-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR & Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm F70EXR Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F70EXR over the Olympus TG-320
| F70EXR | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the FujiFilm F70EXR
| TG-320 | F70EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm F70EXR and Olympus TG-320
| F70EXR | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm F70EXR has exterior dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the F70EXR against the TG-320.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the F70EXR and TG-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The visual below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the F70EXR and TG-320.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The F70EXR featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-320 will produce more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The older F70EXR will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR | Olympus TG-320 |
| Also referred to as | FinePix F75EXR | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3616 x 2712 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $0 |