Clicky

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB750

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR front
 
Samsung WB750 front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
50
Overall
42

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs

FujiFilm F80EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
  • 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
  • Announced June 2010
  • Alternative Name is FinePix F85EXR
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
  • Revealed September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB750 Overview

Below is a in depth assessment of the FujiFilm F80EXR versus Samsung WB750, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the F80EXR (12MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is fairly close but the F80EXR (1/2") and WB750 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The F80EXR was launched 14 months prior to the WB750 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the F80EXR grades against the WB750 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Samsung WB750

 F80EXR WB750 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the FujiFilm F80EXR

 WB750 F80EXR 
RevealedSeptember 2011June 2010More recent by 14 months
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the FujiFilm F80EXR and Samsung WB750

 F80EXR WB750 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The FujiFilm F80EXR enjoys outer dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Analyze the FujiFilm F80EXR versus Samsung WB750 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the F80EXR versus the WB750.

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB750 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the F80EXR and WB750 is 92 and 93 respectively.

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through specs. The visual below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the F80EXR and WB750.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The F80EXR due to its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Samsung WB750 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The older F80EXR will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR Portrait photography info
Samsung WB750 Portrait photography info
21
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2")
lacks RAW format
42
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (13MP)
offers face detection autofocus
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR Street photography info
Samsung WB750 Street photography info
54
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (210g)
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (193g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR Sports photography information
Samsung WB750 Sports photography information
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2")
lacks phase detect auto focus
51
great zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (13 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with FujiFilm F80EXR
Travel photography with Samsung WB750
59
built-in flash
reasonably wide (27mm)
very long reach (270mm)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (210g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
69
lighter than others in class (193g)
sensor resolution is decent (13 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (432mm)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR Landscape photography info
Samsung WB750 Landscape photography info
38
reasonably wide (27mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
49
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (13MP)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with FujiFilm F80EXR
Vlogging with Samsung WB750
27
reasonably wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (210g)
34
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (193g)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no external mic jack
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB750 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm F80EXR and Samsung WB750
 FujiFilm FinePix F80EXRSamsung WB750
General Information
Make FujiFilm Samsung
Model type FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR Samsung WB750
Also called FinePix F85EXR -
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-06-16 2011-09-01
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip EXR -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 13MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4096 x 3072
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest boosted ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-270mm (10.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.3-5.6 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range 5cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.20 m 3.30 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 210 gr (0.46 pounds) 193 gr (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-50 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $400 $339