FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Other Name is FinePix F85EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Overview
On this page, we are looking at the FujiFilm F80EXR versus Samsung WB800F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the F80EXR (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the F80EXR (1/2") and WB800F (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe F80EXR was revealed 3 years before the WB800F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the F80EXR grades against the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR and Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm F80EXR Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Samsung WB800F
F80EXR | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the FujiFilm F80EXR
WB800F | F80EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | June 2010 | More modern by 31 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm F80EXR and Samsung WB800F
F80EXR | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm F80EXR features physical dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm F80EXR versus Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the F80EXR vs the WB800F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the F80EXR and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specs. The picture here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the F80EXR and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The F80EXR with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Samsung WB800F will resolve extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged F80EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Samsung WB800F |
Alternative name | FinePix F85EXR | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-06-16 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 210 gr (0.46 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $400 | $300 |