Clicky

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

FujiFilm F80EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
  • 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Other Name is FinePix F85EXR
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Overview

On this page, we are looking at the FujiFilm F80EXR versus Samsung WB800F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the F80EXR (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the F80EXR (1/2") and WB800F (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The F80EXR was revealed 3 years before the WB800F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the F80EXR grades against the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Samsung WB800F

 F80EXR WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the FujiFilm F80EXR

 WB800F F80EXR 
RevealedJanuary 2013June 2010More modern by 31 months
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the FujiFilm F80EXR and Samsung WB800F

 F80EXR WB800F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm F80EXR features physical dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Take a look at the FujiFilm F80EXR versus Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the F80EXR vs the WB800F.

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the F80EXR and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specs. The picture here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the F80EXR and WB800F.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The F80EXR with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Samsung WB800F will resolve extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged F80EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR Portrait photography features
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography features
21
no manual focus
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2")
lack of RAW files
44
has manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
has face detect focus
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR Street photography advice
Samsung WB800F Street photography advice
54
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition (210g)
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (218 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR Sports photography info
Samsung WB800F Sports photography info
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2")
lack of phase detect autofocus
53
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with FujiFilm F80EXR
Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
59
built-in flash
rather wide (27mm)
great reach (270mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (210 grams)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
69
lighter than average in class (218g)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR Landscape photography details
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography details
38
rather wide (27mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse recording
50
has manual focus
rather wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm F80EXR Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB800F Vlogging highlights
27
rather wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone support
more heavy than competition (210g)
35
rather wide (23mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (218g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm F80EXR and Samsung WB800F
 FujiFilm FinePix F80EXRSamsung WB800F
General Information
Company FujiFilm Samsung
Model type FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR Samsung WB800F
Alternative name FinePix F85EXR -
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-06-16 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXR -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest boosted ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-270mm (10.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.3-5.6 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Crop factor 5.6 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.20 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 210 gr (0.46 pounds) 218 gr (0.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $400 $300