FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-80
96 Imaging
36 Features
18 Overall
28
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Launched January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-80, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the JV200 (14MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe JV200 was unveiled 12 years prior to the WG-80 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the JV200 scores against the WG-80 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 and Ricoh WG-80. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Ricoh WG-80
| JV200 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the FujiFilm JV200
| WG-80 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 138 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Ricoh WG-80
| JV200 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.70" | Same screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The FujiFilm JV200 has got outside measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the JV200 vs the WG-80.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the JV200 and WG-80 is 96 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the JV200 and WG-80.
As you can see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-80 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged JV200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Also called | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.70 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $49 | $300 |