Clicky

FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
22
Overall
31
FujiFilm FinePix JX300 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31

FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs

FujiFilm JX300
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
  • 130g - 94 x 56 x 24mm
  • Introduced January 2011
  • Other Name is FinePix JX305
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575 Overview

Here is a comprehensive analysis of the FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the JX300 (14MP) and the M575 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The JX300 was revealed 13 months later than the M575 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm JX300 being a Compact camera and the Kodak M575 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the JX300 matches up against the M575 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm JX300 over the Kodak M575

 JX300 M575 
IntroducedJanuary 2011January 2010Fresher by 13 months

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the FujiFilm JX300

 M575 JX300 
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the FujiFilm JX300 and Kodak M575

 JX300 M575 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The FujiFilm JX300 provides external measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Kodak M575 has sizing of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Contrast the FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the JX300 versus the M575.

FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the JX300 and M575 is 95 and 95 respectively.

FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the JX300 and M575.

As you can tell, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels and you can expect similar quality of files although you may want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The fresher JX300 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with FujiFilm JX300
Portrait photography with Kodak M575
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
28
good resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

FujiFilm JX300 as a Street photography camera
Kodak M575 as a Street photography camera
55
lighter than others (130g)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (152g)
max ISO too low (1,000)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with FujiFilm JX300
Sports photography with Kodak M575
31
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
low fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (180 per charge)
lacks phase detect AF
26
good resolution (14MP)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

FujiFilm JX300 Travel photography highlights
Kodak M575 Travel photography highlights
65
lighter than others (130 grams)
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
bad battery power (180 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
68
good resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (152g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with FujiFilm JX300
Landscape photography with Kodak M575
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
bad battery power (180 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
40
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
good resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
no RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm JX300 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak M575 as a Vlogging camera
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
lighter than others (130g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic jack
28
fairly wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic port
heavier than competition in class (152g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak M575 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm JX300 and Kodak M575
 FujiFilm FinePix JX300Kodak EasyShare M575
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Kodak
Model FujiFilm FinePix JX300 Kodak EasyShare M575
Otherwise known as FinePix JX305 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2011-01-05 2010-01-05
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1000
Max boosted ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.6-6.2 -
Macro focus distance 10cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1800 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 130 grams (0.29 pounds) 152 grams (0.34 pounds)
Physical dimensions 94 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model - KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD / SDHC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $110 $139