FujiFilm S2800HD vs Hasselblad X1D
75 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Hasselblad X1D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Hasselblad X1D Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the FujiFilm S2800HD and Hasselblad X1D, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the S2800HD (14MP) and X1D (51MP) and the S2800HD (1/2.3") and X1D (Medium format) enjoy different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S2800HD was introduced 7 years earlier than the X1D and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the S2800HD scores vs the X1D in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Hasselblad X1D Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD and Hasselblad X1D. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery and Hasselblad X1D Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Hasselblad X1D
S2800HD | X1D |
---|
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the FujiFilm S2800HD
X1D | S2800HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2016 | February 2010 | More recent by 77 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Hasselblad X1D
S2800HD | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Hasselblad X1D Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S2800HD has got outside dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") along with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Hasselblad X1D has proportions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm S2800HD and Hasselblad X1D in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the S2800HD against the X1D.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S2800HD and X1D is 75 and 60 respectively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Hasselblad X1D Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S2800HD and X1D.
Clearly, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S2800HD with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Hasselblad X1D will result in greater detail using its extra 37 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older S2800HD will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Hasselblad X1D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Hasselblad X1D Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Hasselblad X1D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Hasselblad X1D |
Also Known as | FinePix S2900HD | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2016-06-22 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 51MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 8272 x 6200 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Hasselblad X |
Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 4 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 99% | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 2.3fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (25p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 437 grams (0.96 pounds) | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | One | 2 |
Launch cost | $260 | $6,495 |