FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-620
75 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-620 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the FujiFilm S2800HD versus Olympus E-620, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S2800HD (14MP) and the E-620 (12MP) is very well matched but the S2800HD (1/2.3") and E-620 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizes.
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI LegislationThe S2800HD was released 8 months later than the E-620 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the S2800HD matches up vs the E-620 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-620 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD and Olympus E-620. The complete galleries are available at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery and Olympus E-620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Olympus E-620
S2800HD | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | July 2009 | More recent by 8 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the FujiFilm S2800HD
E-620 | S2800HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Olympus E-620
S2800HD | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-620 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm S2800HD provides physical measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus E-620 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm S2800HD versus Olympus E-620 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the S2800HD and the E-620.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S2800HD and E-620 is 75 and 71 respectively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-620 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S2800HD and E-620.
To sum up, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S2800HD because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the FujiFilm S2800HD will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent S2800HD provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus E-620 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Olympus E-620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Olympus E-620 |
Also called as | FinePix S2900HD | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2009-07-06 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 7 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 99 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.48x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 437 grams (0.96 lb) | 500 grams (1.10 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $260 | $799 |