FujiFilm S3200 vs Kodak Z990
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Portability
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
FujiFilm S3200 vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs
FujiFilm S3200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Launched January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix S3250
Kodak Z990
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2011
- Also Known as EasyShare Max
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm S3200 vs Kodak Z990 Overview
Its time to look closer at the FujiFilm S3200 and Kodak Z990, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the S3200 (14MP) and the Z990 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S3200 was brought out at a similar time to the Z990 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the S3200 matches up vs the Z990 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm S3200 vs Kodak Z990 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 & Kodak EasyShare Z990. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery & Kodak Z990 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Kodak Z990
| S3200 | Z990 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the FujiFilm S3200
| Z990 | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Kodak Z990
| S3200 | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S3200 has got physical dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z990 has dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm S3200 and Kodak Z990 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the S3200 compared to the Z990.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the S3200 and Z990 is 67 and 68 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S3200 and Z990.
To sum up, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the FujiFilm S3200 to result in extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with FujiFilm S3200
Portrait photography with Kodak Z990
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
you can focus manually
comes with face detection focusing
exports RAW files
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm S3200
Street photography with Kodak Z990
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competitors (540 grams)
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Z990 as a Sports photography camera
amazing zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
great zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second low (6.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 Travel photography advice
Kodak Z990 Travel photography advice
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long reach (576mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (540g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
great zoom (840mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with FujiFilm S3200
Landscape photography with Kodak Z990
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse recording
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 Vlogging information
Kodak Z990 Vlogging information
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone port
more heavy than competitors (540g)
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm S3200 vs Kodak Z990 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Kodak EasyShare Z990 |
| Also called as | FinePix S3250 | EasyShare Max |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-04 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 8.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 540 gr (1.19 pounds) | 445 gr (0.98 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $190 | $299 |
