FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh WG-M1
67 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Announced January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix S3250
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the S3200 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S3200 was revealed 4 years before the WG-M1 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the S3200 scores vs the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| S3200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the FujiFilm S3200
| WG-M1 | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 44 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Ricoh WG-M1
| S3200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S3200 enjoys external dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") along with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the S3200 compared to the WG-M1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S3200 and WG-M1 is 67 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S3200 and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP and you can expect similar quality of files although you would want to take the age of the products into consideration. The older S3200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Also referred to as | FinePix S3250 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540 grams (1.19 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $190 | $2,000 |