Clicky

Fujifilm A150 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Fujifilm FinePix A150 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm A150 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm A150
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 130g - 92 x 61 x 22mm
  • Launched February 2009
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • New Model is Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm A150 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm A150 versus Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm A150 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm A150 was released 3 years prior to the VR-320 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the Fujifilm A150 matches up vs the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm A150 over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm A150 VR-320 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm A150

 VR-320 Fujifilm A150 
ReleasedJuly 2011February 2009Newer by 29 months

Common features in the Fujifilm A150 and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm A150 VR-320 
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm A150 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm A150 has got outside measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm A150 versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm A150 against the VR-320.

Fujifilm A150 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm A150 and VR-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm A150 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm A150 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm A150 and VR-320.

Clearly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus VR-320 to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm A150 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Fujifilm A150 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm A150 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm A150 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm A150 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
low MP (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
33
decent MP (14MP)
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm A150
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
54
lighter than average (130 grams)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm A150
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
16
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm A150 Travel photography features
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography features
56
lighter than average (130g)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm A150 Landscape photography features
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography features
27
screen size is decent (3 inch)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
42
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm A150 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging information
25
lighter than average (130 grams)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
32
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm A150 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm A150 and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm FinePix A150Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix A150 Olympus VR-320
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-02-04 2011-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.90 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 130 grams (0.29 lbs) 158 grams (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 92 x 61 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $130 $179