Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung TL320
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung TL320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is fairly similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and TL320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm F200EXR was manufactured 3 months after the TL320 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores vs the TL320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Samsung TL320. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Samsung TL320
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TL320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| TL320 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung TL320
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm F200EXR enjoys external dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has specifications of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung TL320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the TL320.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and TL320 is 93 and 98 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over specs. The picture underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and TL320.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide the same MP but not the same sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR comes with the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh simpler.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung TL320 |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB1000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-04-30 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $350 | $380 |