Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
78 Imaging
73 Features
59 Overall
67
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Sigma Quattro H, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and Quattro H (APS-H) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durabilityThe Fujifilm F200EXR was launched 7 years prior to the Quattro H which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the Quattro H in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Sigma sd Quattro H. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Sigma Quattro H
Fujifilm F200EXR | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Fujifilm F200EXR
Quattro H | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | April 2009 | Newer by 83 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Sigma Quattro H
Fujifilm F200EXR | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR comes with outside dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm F200EXR and Sigma Quattro H in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus the Quattro H.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Quattro H is 93 and 78 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specifications. The picture below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Quattro H.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 33MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 45 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6200 x 4152 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-50 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $350 | $1,134 |