Clicky

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
38
Features
33
Overall
36

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm F750EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
  • Released January 2012
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F750EXR (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm F750EXR (1/2") and TG-320 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

The Fujifilm F750EXR was introduced around the same time to the TG-320 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm F750EXR matches up versus the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F750EXR over the Olympus TG-320

 Fujifilm F750EXR TG-320 
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm F750EXR

 TG-320 Fujifilm F750EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm F750EXR and Olympus TG-320

 Fujifilm F750EXR TG-320 
LaunchedJanuary 2012January 2012Similar age
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F750EXR has got exterior dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F750EXR versus the TG-320.

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F750EXR and TG-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F750EXR and TG-320.

Plainly, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F750EXR with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm F750EXR will give you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively.

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
37
good MP (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2")
lack of RAW format
34
decent megapixels (14MP)
provides face detect focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR Street photography details
Olympus TG-320 Street photography details
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (234g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2")
lack of RAW format
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
53
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2")
lack of phase detect AF
41
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (150 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than average in class (234 grams)
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
very long zoom (500mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
67
lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
environment sealing
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery pack (150 CIPA)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography info
45
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is very small (1/2")
lack of RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
39
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
environment sealing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
terrible battery pack (150 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F750EXR Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging advice
34
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (234 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
does not have external mic port
32
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic jack
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F750EXR and Olympus TG-320
 Fujifilm FinePix F750EXROlympus TG-320
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR Olympus TG-320
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Released 2012-01-05 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR TruePic III+
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus range 5cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 11.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 5.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 234 gr (0.52 pounds) 155 gr (0.34 pounds)
Physical dimensions 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-50A LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $445 $0