Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
55
Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Launched January 2013
  • Previous Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Introduced February 2010
  • Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm F900EXR was introduced 3 years after the SP-800 UZ which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up vs the SP-800 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm F900EXR SP-800 UZ 
IntroducedJanuary 2013February 2010Newer by 37 months
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm F900EXR

 SP-800 UZ Fujifilm F900EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm F900EXR SP-800 UZ 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR features physical dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR against the SP-800 UZ.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and SP-800 UZ is 90 and 69 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The pic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and SP-800 UZ.

As you can tell, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm F900EXR will offer extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm F900EXR is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography details
Olympus SP-800 UZ Portrait photography details
44
decent megapixels (16MP)
features face detect focus
saves RAW formats
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2")
28
resolution is good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Street photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
68
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2")
46
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography info
Olympus SP-800 UZ Sports photography info
55
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
features tracking focus
has phase detect auto focus
sensor size is small (1/2")
low battery (260 shots)
47
long zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography advice
Olympus SP-800 UZ Travel photography advice
66
lighter than competition in class (232g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
low battery (260 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
61
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
long zoom (840mm)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Landscape photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
47
really wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
saves RAW formats
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is small (1/2")
low battery (260 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse function
41
fairly wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Vlogging camera
34
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have mic jack
24
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXROlympus SP-800 UZ
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Olympus SP-800 UZ
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-01-30 2010-02-02
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR II TruePic III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 1000
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 143
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-840mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 12 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 11.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 3.10 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 232 grams (0.51 lbs) 455 grams (1.00 lbs)
Physical dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-50A Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $380 $270