Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Launched January 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm F900EXR was introduced 3 years after the SP-800 UZ which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up vs the SP-800 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm F900EXR | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | February 2010 | Newer by 37 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm F900EXR
SP-800 UZ | Fujifilm F900EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm F900EXR | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR features physical dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR against the SP-800 UZ.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and SP-800 UZ is 90 and 69 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The pic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and SP-800 UZ.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm F900EXR will offer extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm F900EXR is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR II | TruePic III |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | 1000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 12 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $380 | $270 |