Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
89 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
89 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Key Specs
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Older Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Olympus SZ-31MR iHS, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the SZ-31MR iHS (16MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and SZ-31MR iHS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm F900EXR was manufactured 12 months later than the SZ-31MR iHS which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades against the SZ-31MR iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Olympus SZ-31MR iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
| Fujifilm F900EXR | SZ-31MR iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-31MR iHS over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| SZ-31MR iHS | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
| Fujifilm F900EXR | SZ-31MR iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 920k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR has external dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS has proportions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Olympus SZ-31MR iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR and the SZ-31MR iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and SZ-31MR iHS is 90 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The visual here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F900EXR and SZ-31MR iHS.
As you have seen, both cameras have the same megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR has got the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The more recent Fujifilm F900EXR is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography details
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Portrait photography details
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
exports RAW formats
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2")
megapixel count decent (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography features
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Street photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (232 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features focus via touch
lighter than competition in class (226g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography details
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Sports photography details
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
supports tracking focus
has phase detect auto focus
sensor size is small (1/2")
not so great battery power (260 CIPA)
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (200 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competitors in class (232g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
long reach (500mm)
no Timelapse mode
not so great battery power (260 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (226g)
features focus via touch
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
lack of Timelapse function
bad battery life (200 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography details
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Landscape photography details
pretty wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
exports RAW formats
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is small (1/2")
not so great battery power (260 CIPA)
no Timelapse mode
reasonably wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery life (200 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging advice
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Vlogging advice
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (232g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
no microphone port
reasonably wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (226g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus SZ-31MR iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus SZ-31MR iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR II | Dual TruePic V |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | Hypercrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 9.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | 200 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $380 | $0 |
