Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ

Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front
Portability
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Released January 2013
  • Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
  • 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
  • Revealed August 2012
  • Replaced the Olympus SP-820UZ
  • New Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is pretty close but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and SP-820UZ (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm F900EXR was manufactured 6 months later than the SP-820UZ so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores vs the SP-820UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus SP-820UZ

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F900EXR SP-820UZ 
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Fujifilm F900EXR

		

		

			
 SP-820UZ Fujifilm F900EXR 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus SP-820UZ

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F900EXR SP-820UZ 
RevealedJanuary 2013August 2012Same age
Focus manually  Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither includes Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm F900EXR features physical measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-820UZ has specifications of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR and the SP-820UZ.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and SP-820UZ is 90 and 69 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Quite often, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The graphic here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and SP-820UZ.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Fujifilm F900EXR will result in more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.
	
			Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Portrait photography with Olympus SP-820UZ
44
 good  resolution (16 megapixels)
 includes face detection focus
 exports RAW formats
 lack of manual focus
 cannot use external flash
 small sensor size (1/2")
34
 decent megapixels (14MP)
 comes with face detection focus
 lack of manual focus
 manual mode not possible
 can't use external flash
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary
Street Comparison
 Fujifilm F900EXR as a Street photography camera
 Olympus SP-820UZ as a Street photography camera
68
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 lighter than others in class (232g)
 screen is fixed
 small sensor size (1/2")
37
 screen is fixed
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
 heavier than competition in class (485 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography details
Olympus SP-820UZ Sports photography details
55
 long zoom range (25-500mm  20.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (16 megapixels)
 includes tracking autofocus
 has phase detect auto focus
 small sensor size (1/2")
 bad battery power (260 per charge)
33
 incredible zoom range (22-896mm  40.7 x zoom)
 decent megapixels (14MP)
 low fps (2.0 frames/s)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Travel Comparison
 Fujifilm F900EXR as a Travel photography camera
 Olympus SP-820UZ as a Travel photography camera
66
 lighter than others in class (232g)
 good  resolution (16 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (25mm)
 very long reach (500mm)
 lack of Time Lapse mode
 bad battery power (260 CIPA)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
55
 decent megapixels (14MP)
 built-in flash
 really wide (22mm)
 very long zoom (896mm)
 missing Time Lapse function
 heavier than competition in class (485 grams)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Landscape photography with Olympus SP-820UZ
47
 fairly wide (25mm)
 nice screen size (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (16MP)
 exports RAW formats
 lack of manual focus
 can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 small sensor size (1/2")
 bad battery power (260 shots)
 lack of Time Lapse mode
35
 really wide (22mm)
 screen is a decent size (3 inch)
 decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
 lack of manual focus
 cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
 manual mode not possible
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
 missing Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm F900EXR
Vlogging with Olympus SP-820UZ
34
 fairly wide (25mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 includes face detection focus
 video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 lighter than others in class (232 grams)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
 lack of external mic jack
25
 really wide (22mm)
 comes with face detection focus
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 lack of image stabilization
 missing external mic support
 heavier than competition in class (485g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	

		

			
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus SP-820UZ
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXROlympus Stylus SP-820UZ
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2013-01-30 2012-08-21
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip EXR II -
Sensor type EXRCMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
Continuous AF    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 22-896mm (40.7x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.4-5.7
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.6 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 11.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 15.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 232 grams (0.51 lb) 485 grams (1.07 lb)
Physical dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 pictures -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-50A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $380 $299