Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung HZ25W
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Superseded the Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- Other Name is WB5000
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung HZ25W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and HZ25W (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F900EXR was manufactured 2 years later than the HZ25W and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up versus the HZ25W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Samsung HZ25W. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung HZ25W
Fujifilm F900EXR | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | July 2010 | More recent by 32 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Fujifilm F900EXR
HZ25W | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung HZ25W
Fujifilm F900EXR | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm F900EXR enjoys outer measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung HZ25W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung HZ25W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR and the HZ25W.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and HZ25W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The photograph below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and HZ25W.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm F900EXR will render extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm F900EXR should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung HZ25W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung HZ25W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB5000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR II | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 428 gr (0.94 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $380 | $350 |