Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Released January 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also Known as PL100
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung TL205, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and TL205 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and TL205 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm F900EXR was released 3 years later than the TL205 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades vs the TL205 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Samsung TL205. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung TL205
Fujifilm F900EXR | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
TL205 | Fujifilm F900EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung TL205
Fujifilm F900EXR | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR has got physical dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung TL205 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR versus the TL205.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and TL205 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and TL205.
Plainly, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F900EXR due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm F900EXR will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm F900EXR will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung TL205 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung TL205 |
Also called as | - | PL100 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-01-30 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR II | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 177 gr (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $380 | $180 |