Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
55
Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Samsung TL205 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Released January 2013
  • Previous Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Samsung TL205
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
  • 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Also Known as PL100
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung TL205, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and TL205 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and TL205 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Fujifilm F900EXR was released 3 years later than the TL205 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades vs the TL205 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung TL205

 Fujifilm F900EXR TL205 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013January 2010Fresher by 38 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Fujifilm F900EXR

 TL205 Fujifilm F900EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung TL205

 Fujifilm F900EXR TL205 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR has got physical dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).

See the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung TL205 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR versus the TL205.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and TL205 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and TL205.

Plainly, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F900EXR due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm F900EXR will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm F900EXR will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography information
Samsung TL205 Portrait photography information
44
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
no manual focus
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2")
21
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography details
Samsung TL205 Street photography details
68
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
lighter than average (232 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2")
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than competitors (177 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Sports photography with Samsung TL205
55
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
has tracking focus
comes with phase detect AF
small sensor size (1/2")
low battery pack (260 per charge)
25
offers tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Travel photography with Samsung TL205
66
lighter than average (232g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low battery pack (260 per charge)
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
50
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (177 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung TL205 as a Landscape photography camera
47
quite wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
supports RAW formats
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small sensor size (1/2")
low battery pack (260 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
23
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm F900EXR
Vlogging with Samsung TL205
34
quite wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (232 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone jack
22
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic port
heavier than competitors (177 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung TL205 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung TL205
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXRSamsung TL205
General Information
Make FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Samsung TL205
Also called as - PL100
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Released 2013-01-30 2010-01-06
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip EXR II -
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest boosted ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.0-5.6
Macro focus distance 5cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shooting speed 11.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 3.40 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 232 gr (0.51 lbs) 177 gr (0.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-50A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $380 $180