Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB30F
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB30F Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung WB30F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is relatively comparable but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and WB30F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm F900EXR was introduced around the same time to the WB30F so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores vs the WB30F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung WB30F
| Fujifilm F900EXR | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| WB30F | Fujifilm F900EXR |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung WB30F
| Fujifilm F900EXR | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F900EXR provides external measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung WB30F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR versus the WB30F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and WB30F is 90 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F900EXR and WB30F.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR provides the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography information
Samsung WB30F Portrait photography information
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2")
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography information
Samsung WB30F Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
lighter than others (232g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (128 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography information
Samsung WB30F Sports photography information
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2")
terrible battery power (260 per charge)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography factors
Samsung WB30F Travel photography factors
lighter than others (232 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
missing Timelapse mode
terrible battery power (260 shots)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than average in class (128 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Landscape photography camera
rather wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
exports RAW formats
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is very small (1/2")
terrible battery power (260 shots)
missing Timelapse mode
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB30F as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (232 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone jack
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
lighter than average in class (128 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung WB30F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 pounds) | 128 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $380 | $180 |
