Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Olympus E-PL1
54 Imaging
40 Features
71 Overall
52
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 808g - 135 x 101 x 146mm
- Launched January 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm HS35EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched May 2010
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL1s
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Olympus E-PL1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR (16MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the Fujifilm HS50 EXR (1/2") and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm HS50 EXR was announced 2 years after the E-PL1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm HS50 EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm HS50 EXR grades versus the E-PL1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Olympus E-PL1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR & Olympus PEN E-PL1. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm HS50 EXR Gallery & Olympus E-PL1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS50 EXR over the Olympus E-PL1
Fujifilm HS50 EXR | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | May 2010 | Newer by 33 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Fujifilm HS50 EXR
E-PL1 | Fujifilm HS50 EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Olympus E-PL1
Fujifilm HS50 EXR | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm HS50 EXR features exterior measurements of 135mm x 101mm x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL1 has sizing of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Olympus E-PL1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR compared to the E-PL1.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and E-PL1 is 54 and 86 respectively.
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The pic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and E-PL1.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm HS50 EXR with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Fujifilm HS50 EXR will resolve extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm HS50 EXR should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2010-05-17 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR Processor II | Truepic V |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-1000mm (41.7x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 808 gr (1.78 lbs) | 334 gr (0.74 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 135 x 101 x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 487 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 290 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $288 |