Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-870
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-870, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth FilmingThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was revealed 7 years earlier than the TG-870 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 grades versus the TG-870 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Olympus TG-870
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TG-870 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
TG-870 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | July 2009 | Newer by 78 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus TG-870
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 provides exterior measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has proportions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-870 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and the TG-870.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TG-870 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The picture here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TG-870.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-870 to produce extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W1 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.8 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 260g (0.57 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-95 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $900 | $280 |