Clicky

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
90
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Fujifilm Real 3D W1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
  • Introduced July 2009
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was released 7 years prior to the Quattro and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 matches up vs the Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Sigma Quattro

 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1

 Quattro Fujifilm Real 3D W1 
LaunchedFebruary 2016July 2009Fresher by 80 months
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Display size3"2.8"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution1620k230kClearer display (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Sigma Quattro

 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 provides external measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") along with a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

See the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 compared to the Quattro.

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Quattro is 90 and 63 respectively.

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The visual below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Quattro.

As you can tell, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma Quattro will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 19MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W1 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Portrait photography details
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography details
19
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
81
you can focus manually
great MP (29MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Street photography info
Sigma Quattro Street photography info
45
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competition (260g)
59
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
heavier than average in class (625g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Sports photography camera
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
70
great MP (29 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.8 frames/s)
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Travel photography factors
Sigma Quattro Travel photography factors
48
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (260 grams)
low resolution (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
55
weather proofing
great MP (29 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (625 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Landscape photography features
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography features
26
nice screen size (2.8 inch)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse function
72
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
great MP (29 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
no image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Vlogging factors
Sigma Quattro Vlogging factors
21
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone port
more heavy than competition (260g)
22
provides face detection autofocus
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low ( resolution)
missing external mic jack
heavier than average in class (625 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Sigma Quattro
 Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Sigma
Model Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 Sigma sd Quattro
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-07-22 2016-02-23
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip RP (Real Photo) 3D Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 29 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.7-4.2 -
Macro focus range 8cm -
Amount of lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.8" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/4 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.60 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 -
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 260 gr (0.57 lb) 625 gr (1.38 lb)
Physical dimensions 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-95 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $900 $738