Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was released 7 years prior to the Quattro and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 matches up vs the Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Sigma Quattro
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
Quattro | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | July 2009 | Fresher by 80 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Sigma Quattro
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 provides external measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") along with a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
See the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 compared to the Quattro.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Quattro is 90 and 63 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The visual below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Quattro.
As you can tell, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma Quattro will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 19MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W1 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | - |
Macro focus range | 8cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.8" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 260 gr (0.57 lb) | 625 gr (1.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-95 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $900 | $738 |