Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Leica M Typ 262
90 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced November 2015
- Also Known as Typ 262
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Leica M Typ 262, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Leica. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and M Typ 262 (24MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (1/2.3") and M Typ 262 (Full frame) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was unveiled 6 years before the M Typ 262 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera and the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades against the M Typ 262 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Leica M Typ 262. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Leica M Typ 262 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Leica M Typ 262
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 921k | Crisper screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| M Typ 262 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2015 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 64 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Leica M Typ 262
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 enjoys physical dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Leica M Typ 262 has sizing of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Leica M Typ 262 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs the M Typ 262.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and M Typ 262 is 90 and 77 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The visual below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and M Typ 262.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Leica M Typ 262 will provide extra detail having an extra 14MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Leica M Typ 262 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Leica |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Leica M Typ 262 |
| Other name | - | Typ 262 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2010-08-17 | 2015-11-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | Maestro |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5952 x 3976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Leica M |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 59 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,150k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (rangefinder) |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | BP-SCL2 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $900 | $5,069 |
