Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus E-330
90 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus E-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-450
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus E-330 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus E-330, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and E-330 (7MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (1/2.3") and E-330 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was introduced 4 years after the E-330 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 scores vs the E-330 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus E-330 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus E-330. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus E-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus E-330
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2010 |  | March 2006 | Newer by 54 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
| Display resolution | 1150k |  | 215k | Clearer display (+935k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| E-330 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus E-330
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus E-330 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has got external measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus E-330 has specifications of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus E-330 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 compared to the E-330.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and E-330 is 90 and 65 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus E-330 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The image underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and E-330.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 with its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will give you more detail using its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus E-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus E-330 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus E-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus E-330 |
| Also Known as | - | EVOLT E-330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-08-17 | 2006-03-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 7 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3136 x 2352 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 1,150 thousand dots | 215 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 616 gr (1.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $900 | $1,100 |
