Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
90 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was released 3 years earlier than the TG-830 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades versus the TG-830 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1150k | 460k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
TG-830 iHS | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | August 2010 | More recent by 29 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 offers physical dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 against the TG-830 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-830 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-830 iHS.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus TG-830 iHS to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-08-17 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,150k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 214 grams (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $900 | $0 |