Fujifilm S2000HD vs Leica M Typ 240
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Leica M Typ 240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Fujifilm S2000HD vs Leica M Typ 240, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Leica. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and M Typ 240 (24MP) and the Fujifilm S2000HD (1/2.3") and M Typ 240 (Full frame) feature different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm S2000HD was revealed 4 years before the M Typ 240 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm S2000HD matches up versus the M Typ 240 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Leica M Typ 240 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD and Leica M Typ 240. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery and Leica M Typ 240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Leica M Typ 240
Fujifilm S2000HD | M Typ 240 |
---|
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
M Typ 240 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2012 | January 2009 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Leica M Typ 240
Fujifilm S2000HD | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Leica M Typ 240 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S2000HD has got exterior measurements of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Leica M Typ 240 has measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S2000HD vs Leica M Typ 240 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD and the M Typ 240.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S2000HD and M Typ 240 is 75 and 74 respectively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Leica M Typ 240 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S2000HD and M Typ 240.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm S2000HD with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Leica M Typ 240 will resolve extra detail because of its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S2000HD is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Leica M Typ 240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Leica M Typ 240 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Leica M Typ 240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Leica |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Leica M Typ 240 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2012-09-17 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5952 x 3976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Leica M |
Lens focal range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 1 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lb) | 680g (1.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 84 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1860 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $280 | $5,479 |