Fujifilm S4200 vs Nikon D3400
67 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
70 Imaging
68 Features
70 Overall
68
Fujifilm S4200 vs Nikon D3400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 395g - 124 x 98 x 76mm
- Launched August 2016
- Previous Model is Nikon D3300
- Newer Model is Nikon D3500
Fujifilm S4200 vs Nikon D3400 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Fujifilm S4200 versus Nikon D3400, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors FujiFilm and Nikon. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm S4200 (14MP) and D3400 (24MP) and the Fujifilm S4200 (1/2.3") and D3400 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe Fujifilm S4200 was released 5 years before the D3400 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S4200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon D3400 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm S4200 grades vs the D3400 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm S4200 vs Nikon D3400 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S4200 and Nikon D3400. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S4200 Gallery and Nikon D3400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4200 over the Nikon D3400
Fujifilm S4200 | D3400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon D3400 over the Fujifilm S4200
D3400 | Fujifilm S4200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2016 | January 2012 | Newer by 56 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4200 and Nikon D3400
Fujifilm S4200 | D3400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm S4200 vs Nikon D3400 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S4200 offers outside measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") along with a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs) and the Nikon D3400 has measurements of 124mm x 98mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S4200 versus Nikon D3400 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm S4200 and the D3400.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S4200 and D3400 is 67 and 70 respectively.
Fujifilm S4200 vs Nikon D3400 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The image below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S4200 and D3400.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm S4200 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Nikon D3400 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S4200 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Fujifilm S4200 vs Nikon D3400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S4200 vs Nikon D3400 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Nikon D3400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Nikon D3400 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2016-08-17 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Expeed 4 |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Nikon F |
Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 309 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.56x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 7.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Off, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/200 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 543g (1.20 lbs) | 395g (0.87 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 124 x 98 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 86 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1192 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 1200 shots |
Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | EN-EL14a |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs (1-9 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $200 | $397 |