Clicky

Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak M340

Portability
66
Imaging
40
Features
37
Overall
38
Fujifilm FinePix S4800 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24

Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs

Fujifilm S4800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Announced January 2013
Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak M340 Overview

The following is a in-depth review of the Fujifilm S4800 versus Kodak M340, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) and M340 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The Fujifilm S4800 was unveiled 4 years after the M340 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S4800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Kodak M340 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm S4800 grades vs the M340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Kodak M340

 Fujifilm S4800 M340 
IntroducedJanuary 2013January 2009Newer by 50 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Fujifilm S4800

 M340 Fujifilm S4800 

Common features in the Fujifilm S4800 and Kodak M340

 Fujifilm S4800 M340 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm S4800 enjoys external measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") and a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Kodak M340 has specifications of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm S4800 versus Kodak M340 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S4800 against the M340.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak M340 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S4800 and M340 is 66 and 96 respectively.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak M340 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The picture here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S4800 and M340.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Fujifilm S4800 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S4800 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak M340 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak M340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm S4800
Portrait photography with Kodak M340
37
good resolution (16MP)
supports face detect focus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
19
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Street photography highlights
Kodak M340 Street photography highlights
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than competition (518 grams)
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 Sports photography details
Kodak M340 Sports photography details
48
great zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
supports tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S4800
Travel photography with Kodak M340
54
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (720mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (518 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
51
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
MP count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S4800
Landscape photography with Kodak M340
42
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
22
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S4800 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak M340 as a Vlogging camera
24
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic port
heavier than competition (518g)
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm S4800 vs Kodak M340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S4800 and Kodak M340
 Fujifilm FinePix S4800Kodak EasyShare M340
General Information
Company FujiFilm Kodak
Model Fujifilm FinePix S4800 Kodak EasyShare M340
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Announced 2013-01-30 2009-01-05
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 3664 x 2748
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max enhanced ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 64 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 5
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-720mm (30.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/3.1-5.7
Macro focus range 2cm 7cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 518 grams (1.14 lbs) 115 grams (0.25 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $229 $130