Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus E-M10 III
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus E-M10 III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and the E-M10 III (16MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm S8400W (1/2.3") and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) possess different sensor measurements.
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durabilityThe Fujifilm S8400W was announced 5 years earlier than the E-M10 III and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm S8400W grades against the E-M10 III for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S8400W & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm S8400W Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Olympus E-M10 III
Fujifilm S8400W | E-M10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Fujifilm S8400W
E-M10 III | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | March 2013 | More recent by 54 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Olympus E-M10 III
Fujifilm S8400W | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S8400W enjoys physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 III has proportions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus E-M10 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W and the E-M10 III.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8400W and E-M10 III is 61 and 80 respectively.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The visual below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8400W and E-M10 III.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm S8400W has the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF more challenging. The older Fujifilm S8400W will be behind in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2017-08-31 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-1056mm (44.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670g (1.48 pounds) | 410g (0.90 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 330 pictures |
Form of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | BLS-50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $650 |