Clicky

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-850 iHS

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S8400W front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs

Fujifilm S8400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched March 2013
Olympus TG-850 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview

Here is a in-depth review of the Fujifilm S8400W and Olympus TG-850 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The Fujifilm S8400W was brought out 10 months prior to the TG-850 iHS which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm S8400W grades vs the TG-850 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Olympus TG-850 iHS

 Fujifilm S8400W TG-850 iHS 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Fujifilm S8400W

 TG-850 iHS Fujifilm S8400W 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014March 2013Fresher by 10 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Olympus TG-850 iHS

 Fujifilm S8400W TG-850 iHS 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Display resolution460k460kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S8400W has physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Examine the Fujifilm S8400W and Olympus TG-850 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W against the TG-850 iHS.

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8400W and TG-850 iHS is 61 and 91 respectively.

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by going through technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8400W and TG-850 iHS.

As you have seen, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you should always consider the age of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm S8400W will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
40
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
35
good resolution (16MP)
offers face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W Street photography info
Olympus TG-850 iHS Street photography info
41
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition (670g)
69
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
environment proofing
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Sports photography camera
53
amazing zoom range (24-1056mm 44.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
51
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
better than average battery life (330 per charge)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W Travel photography details
Olympus TG-850 iHS Travel photography details
52
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (1056mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (670g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
72
better than average battery life (330 shots)
environment proofing
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (21mm)
does not offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
47
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse recording
50
relatively wide (21mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
environment proofing
better than average battery life (330 CIPA)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W Vlogging info
Olympus TG-850 iHS Vlogging info
24
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (670g)
33
relatively wide (21mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly display
missing external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8400W and Olympus TG-850 iHS
 Fujifilm FinePix S8400WOlympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix S8400W Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Launched 2013-03-22 2014-01-29
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4616 x 3464
Highest native ISO 12800 6400
Min native ISO 64 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1056mm (44.0x) 21-105mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.5-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 1/2 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 10.0fps 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Yes
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 gr (1.48 lb) 218 gr (0.48 lb)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots 330 shots
Battery style AA Battery Pack
Battery model 4 x AA LI-50B
Self timer - Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval))
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $300 $250