Clicky

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S8400W front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm S8400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Released March 2013
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Below is a complete comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm S8400W was manufactured 15 months later than the TG-320 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm S8400W scores vs the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Olympus TG-320

		

		

			
 Fujifilm S8400W TG-320 
ReleasedMarch 2013January 2012More recent by 15 months
Manual focus  Dial exact focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm S8400W

		

		

			
 TG-320 Fujifilm S8400W 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Olympus TG-320

		

		

			
 Fujifilm S8400W TG-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither includes Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm S8400W features physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W vs the TG-320.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8400W and TG-320 is 61 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8400W and TG-320.
As you can see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Fujifilm S8400W to offer you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S8400W should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
	
			Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography advice
40
 has manual focus
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
34
 MP count good (14 megapixels)
 supports face detect focus
 no manual focus
 manual mode not possible
 can't use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Street photography highlights
41
 image stabilization (Optical)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
 more heavy than competition in class (670g)
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 lighter than competition (155 grams)
 screen is fixed
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
 Fujifilm S8400W as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
53
 excellent zoom range (24-1056mm  44.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 features tracking focus
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no phase detect AF
41
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count good (14MP)
 supports tracking focus
 environment proof
 low frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
 no shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 terrible battery power (150 per charge)
 no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Fujifilm S8400W
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
52
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 fairly wide (24mm)
 great reach (1056mm)
 missing Timelapse function
 more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
 does not feature selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
67
 lighter than competition (155g)
 environment proof
 MP count good (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 relatively wide (28mm)
 lack of Timelapse function
 terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly display
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography highlights
47
 has manual focus
 fairly wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
 missing Timelapse function
39
 relatively wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count good (14MP)
 environment proof
 no manual focus
 can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 tiny screen (2.7")
 manual mode not possible
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
 terrible battery power (150 per charge)
 lack of Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Vlogging information
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging information
24
 fairly wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
 does not feature selfie friendly display
 missing microphone jack
 more heavy than competition in class (670g)
32
 relatively wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detect focus
 lighter than competition (155g)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly display
 video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
 lack of microphone jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	

		

			
Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8400W and Olympus TG-320
 Fujifilm FinePix S8400WOlympus TG-320
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S8400W Olympus TG-320
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Released 2013-03-22 2012-01-10
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 12800 1600
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Tracking autofocus    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1056mm (44.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing range 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch function    
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/1700s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 7.00 m 5.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 670 gr (1.48 lbs) 155 gr (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos 150 photos
Battery format AA Battery Pack
Battery ID 4 x AA LI-42B
Self timer - Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $300 $0