Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus E-P3
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus E-P3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Announced August 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P2
- Replacement is Olympus E-P5
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus E-P3 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus E-P3, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and E-P3 (12MP) and the Fujifilm S9400W (1/2.3") and E-P3 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm S9400W was revealed 2 years later than the E-P3 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores vs the E-P3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus E-P3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W and Olympus PEN E-P3. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery and Olympus E-P3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Olympus E-P3
Fujifilm S9400W | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | August 2011 | More recent by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Fujifilm S9400W
E-P3 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus E-P3
Fujifilm S9400W | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus E-P3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9400W has exterior measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus E-P3 has specifications of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus E-P3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the E-P3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9400W and E-P3 is 61 and 86 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus E-P3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specs. The graphic below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9400W and E-P3.
All in all, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm S9400W using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Fujifilm S9400W will deliver extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9400W will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus E-P3 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Olympus PEN E-P3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Olympus PEN E-P3 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-01-06 | 2011-08-17 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 369 gr (0.81 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 51 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 330 shots |
Battery format | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $330 | $0 |