Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Samsung NX200 front
Portability
90
Imaging
62
Features
57
Overall
60

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2014
Samsung NX200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
  • Released February 2012
  • Older Model is Samsung NX100
  • Replacement is Samsung NX210
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Overview

Below, we will be matching up the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung NX200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is relatively comparable but the Fujifilm S9400W (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm S9400W was introduced 23 months later than the NX200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades vs the NX200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung NX200

 Fujifilm S9400W NX200 
ReleasedJanuary 2014February 2012Fresher by 23 months

Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Fujifilm S9400W

 NX200 Fujifilm S9400W 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen resolution614k460kSharper screen (+154k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung NX200

 Fujifilm S9400W NX200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9400W comes with exterior measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung NX200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the NX200.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and NX200 is 61 and 90 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The visual here will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9400W and NX200.

To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm S9400W having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX200 will provide more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S9400W will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography details
Samsung NX200 Portrait photography details
37
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
77
focusing manually
decent MP (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Street photography with Samsung NX200
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than average in class (670g)
73
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition (223 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Sports photography with Samsung NX200
55
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (500 CIPA)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
56
decent MP (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Travel photography camera
Samsung NX200 as a Travel photography camera
54
better than average battery pack (500 shots)
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (670 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.9)
68
lighter than competition (223g)
decent MP (20MP)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung NX200 as a Landscape photography camera
44
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
better than average battery pack (500 shots)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
71
focusing manually
swap lenses (Samsung NX mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
does not have image stabilization
does not have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Vlogging camera
Samsung NX200 as a Vlogging camera
26
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (670 grams)
34
has face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (223 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
does not have external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung NX200
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WSamsung NX200
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Samsung NX200
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2014-01-06 2012-02-28
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 12800 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 15
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 32
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames/s 7.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 grams (1.48 pounds) 223 grams (0.49 pounds)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 69
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 618
Other
Battery life 500 shots 330 shots
Battery form AA Battery Pack
Battery model 4 x AA BC1030
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $330 $818