Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Released February 2012
- Older Model is Samsung NX100
- Replacement is Samsung NX210
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung NX200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is relatively comparable but the Fujifilm S9400W (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm S9400W was introduced 23 months later than the NX200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades vs the NX200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Samsung NX200. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung NX200
Fujifilm S9400W | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | February 2012 | Fresher by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Fujifilm S9400W
NX200 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung NX200
Fujifilm S9400W | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9400W comes with exterior measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung NX200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the NX200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and NX200 is 61 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The visual here will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9400W and NX200.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm S9400W having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX200 will provide more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S9400W will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung NX200 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) | 223 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 330 shots |
Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $330 | $818 |