Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL225

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Announced January 2014
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Launched August 2009
  • Alternate Name is ST550
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL225 Overview

Following is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung TL225, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm S9400W was announced 4 years after the TL225 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores against the TL225 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung TL225

 Fujifilm S9400W TL225 
LaunchedJanuary 2014August 2009More modern by 54 months

Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Fujifilm S9400W

 TL225 Fujifilm S9400W 
Display sizing3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1152k460kCrisper display (+692k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung TL225

 Fujifilm S9400W TL225 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9400W offers external measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).

Contrast the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung TL225 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W compared to the TL225.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL225 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and TL225 is 61 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9400W and TL225.

As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S9400W to provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9400W is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Portrait photography camera
37
MP count decent (16MP)
includes face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
21
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Street photography highlights
Samsung TL225 Street photography highlights
41
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competition in class (670 grams)
59
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has focus via touch
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than average (187 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Sports photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Sports photography camera
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
good battery life (500 shots)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography factors
Samsung TL225 Travel photography factors
54
good battery life (500 CIPA)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (670 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.9)
59
has focus via touch
built-in flash
relatively wide (27mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than average (187 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography advice
Samsung TL225 Landscape photography advice
44
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good battery life (500 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
37
relatively wide (27mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm S9400W
Vlogging with Samsung TL225
26
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
missing external mic support
heavier than competition in class (670g)
29
relatively wide (27mm)
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone socket
more heavy than average (187g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung TL225
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WSamsung TL225
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Samsung TL225
Also called - ST550
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Announced 2014-01-06 2009-08-13
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of display 460k dots 1,152k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m 3.40 m
Flash settings Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670g (1.48 lbs) 187g (0.41 lbs)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs -
Style of battery AA -
Battery ID 4 x AA SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $330 $488