Fujifilm S9400W vs Sigma Quattro
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Fujifilm S9400W vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the Fujifilm S9400W (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm S9400W was announced 3 years before the Quattro and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores against the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Sigma Quattro
Fujifilm S9400W | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Fujifilm S9400W
Quattro | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | January 2014 | Fresher by 25 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1620k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Sigma Quattro
Fujifilm S9400W | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9400W enjoys outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm S9400W vs Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the Quattro.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and Quattro is 61 and 63 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9400W and Quattro.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm S9400W having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro will give greater detail with its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S9400W is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Sigma sd Quattro |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 29MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 625 gr (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery type | AA | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $330 | $738 |