Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sigma Quattro H
61 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
78 Imaging
73 Features
59 Overall
67
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 659g - 123 x 89 x 123mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Fujifilm SL1000 and Sigma Quattro H, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm SL1000 (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the Fujifilm SL1000 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm SL1000 was launched 4 years earlier than the Quattro H and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm SL1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm SL1000 scores vs the Quattro H in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm SL1000 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL1000 over the Sigma Quattro H
Fujifilm SL1000 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Fujifilm SL1000
Quattro H | Fujifilm SL1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | January 2013 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1620k | 920k | Sharper screen (+700k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL1000 and Sigma Quattro H
Fujifilm SL1000 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm SL1000 comes with physical dimensions of 123mm x 89mm x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") along with a weight of 659 grams (1.45 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm SL1000 and Sigma Quattro H in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm SL1000 and the Quattro H.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm SL1000 and Quattro H is 61 and 78 respectively.
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm SL1000 and Quattro H.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm SL1000 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sigma Quattro H will render more detail utilizing its extra 29 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm SL1000 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm SL1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6200 x 4152 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.8 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 659g (1.45 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 89 x 123mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 4.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $600 | $1,134 |